Skip to content

Conversation

dignifiedquire
Copy link
Member

@dignifiedquire dignifiedquire commented Dec 26, 2019

The runtime is only needed for tests. Once async-rs/async-std#647 is merged, this should allow for runtime agonstic usage, without enabling the async-std runtime.

@matklad
Copy link
Member

matklad commented Dec 26, 2019

Makes sense! In general, we only use async-std for a channel implementation, but we use a zero-capacity channel, and I think it might make sense to just hand-code the implementation here.

@ForsakenHarmony
Copy link

The requirement seems to have been merged, @dignifiedquire any chance you'll resolve the conflicts?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants